{"id":31875,"date":"2021-07-27T17:43:00","date_gmt":"2021-07-27T14:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ivfclinicsworldwide.com\/is-there-any-seasonal-pattern-to-fecundability-when-is-most-likely-for-babies-to-be-conceived\/"},"modified":"2021-12-14T16:02:36","modified_gmt":"2021-12-14T14:02:36","slug":"is-there-any-seasonal-pattern-to-fecundability-when-is-most-likely-for-babies-to-be-conceived","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ivfclinicsworldwide.com\/it\/is-there-any-seasonal-pattern-to-fecundability-when-is-most-likely-for-babies-to-be-conceived\/","title":{"rendered":"Is there any seasonal pattern to fecundability? When is most likely for babies to be conceived?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In human populations, there are strong seasonal patterns of births that vary across geographic regions and time periods. However, previous studies of seasonality and fecundity are limited because they examine season of birth rather than season of conception and therefore neglect to account for seasonal variation in initiating attempts to conceive or pregnancy loss or differences in gestational length.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The scientists conducted a preconception cohort study<\/a> of 14.331 women residing in North America. Participants were attempting to conceive without fertility treatment and had been attempting pregnancy for \u22646 menstrual cycles at enrolment. They collected information on season of each pregnancy attempt using last menstrual period dates over the study period. Pregnancy was reported on female bi-monthly follow-up questionnaires. They fit log-binomial models with trigonometric regression to examine periodic variation in fecundability. They accounted for seasonal variation in initiation of pregnancy attempts by including indicator variables for menstrual cycle of attempt in the regression models.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the results the initiation of pregnancy attempts peaked in September, with stronger seasonality in North America than in Denmark (48 vs. 16% higher probability initiating attempts in September compared with March). After accounting for seasonal variation in initiation of pregnancy attempts, they observed modest seasonal variation in fecundability, with a peak in the late fall and early winter in both cohorts, but stronger peak\/low ratios in North America (1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05, 1.28) than in Denmark (1.08; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.16). When they stratified the North American data by latitude, they observed the strongest seasonal variation in the southern USA (peak\/low ratio of 1.45 [95% CI: 1.14, 1.84]), with peak fecundability in late November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An understanding of how fecundability varies across seasons could help identify factors that can impair reproductive function. Neglecting to account for seasonal variation in initiation of pregnancy attempts could bias estimates of seasonal patterns in fecundability. This is the first preconception cohort study to examine seasonal variation in fecundability after accounting for seasonality in initiation of pregnancy attempts. Fecundability was highest in the fall and lowest in the spring, with stronger effects in southern latitudes of North America, suggesting that seasonal exposures may affect fecundity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What do you think about \u201cTrying a different season to conceive\u201d?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Hey! If you found this post interesting or useful, you can help us get even better by subscribing to our newsletter. Just write your email and you’ll have the latest news regarding fertility issues. Thank you once more for your help.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n